Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

One-third of Australian organisations are failing to address climate risk

© Shutterstock / NicoElNinoA man standing in front of a digital chart representing climate change over the decades.

Despite the recent impacts of extreme weather, understanding and incorporation of climate risk still has a long way to go in Australia.

A new survey shows that Australian entities are failing to integrate climate risk into their risk management frameworks.

Australian entities acknowledge climate risk as a growing concern, but a lack of requirements and understanding has resulted in below-par disclosures.

Climate risks are a major threat to the long-term health of companies and financial systems if not properly managed.

Findings from a new survey published by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) show that while climate disclosures are on the up for companies in the banking, insurance and superannuation industries, climate risk remains a sticking point. The regulator warned that entities must prepare to meet “rapidly increasing expectations” when it comes to measuring and managing climate risk.

The voluntary climate risk self-assessment survey was issued in March this year, with 64 medium to large institutions responding. The goal of the survey was to assess how entities are identifying, assessing and managing climate-related financial risks.

This comes after the APRA released its final prudential practice guide on climate change financial risks in November 2021. The guide does not impose any regulatory requirements or prescribes any specific actions, but acts more as a compass to steer companies in the right direction when managing their climate risk.

The guide covers areas such as governance, risk management, scenario analysis and disclosure of climate-related financial risks.

APRA chair Wayne Byres explains that the guide does not force companies to make any particular investment, lending or underwriting decision, but the APRA wants to ensure that these “decisions are well-informed, and don’t undermine the interests of bank depositors, insurance policyholders or superannuation members”.

A guiding light for climate risk?

Results from the survey reveal that APRA-regulated entities have in general aligned “well” with the guide, especially in the areas of governance and disclosure. However, only a small portion of the survey respondents indicated they have fully embedded climate risk across their risk management framework.

“The survey findings indicate that most survey participants are taking this issue seriously” commented APRA’s deputy chair Helen Rowell. “However, they also underline that this remains a relatively new and evolving area of risk management, especially with regards to setting metrics and targets”, she added.

While four out of five of the boards surveyed claim to oversee climate risk on a regular basis, only 63% of these entities have incorporated climate risk into their strategic planning process.

While fully integrating climate risk into an entity’s framework is a more complicated and lengthy process, the numbers also are not promising when it comes to putting in place mechanisms to manage this risk in the short-term.

Only 68% of these entities say they have publicly disclosed their approach to measuring and managing climate risk, with the overwhelming majority aligning their disclosures with the Taskforce for Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) framework.

Overall, while it seems that entities are taking more steps to tackle the imminent climate risk issue, they are failing to address the problem at its core, opting for outward-facing targets instead of taking meaningful action. Rowell is “urging” entities to “consider the findings and reflect on their preparedness”.

The results of the survey are not isolated to Australian entities, with regulators around the world also seeing an uptick in climate risk-related disclosures, but not seeing the quantity aligned with quality.

The UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has also warned that despite 90% of the UK’s top companies including a TCFD-aligned disclosure in their annual financial reports, the climate risk disclosures are failing to reach the required standard.

Climate risk is a reality today, not in the future

This lack of climate risk integration is despite the fact that 40% of entities responded saying that climate-related events could have a “material or moderate” impact on their direct operations.

Australia knows first-hand the physical impacts of climate change, after experiencing a wave of devastating wildfires and floods that wreaked havoc on the country’s economy.

For example, this year’s floods in Australia were the countries second most costly extreme weather event, resulting in a whopping A$2 billion ($1.4 billion) in payments made by insurers, a significant hit to the industry.

But this is just the tip of the iceberg. The economic cost of climate impacts in the country are expected to nearly triple by 2050 compared to 2017 according to Australia’s national science agency CSIRO.

However, the physical risks of climate change are just one aspect that entities have to deal with as the world moves towards net zero.

Australia has recently agreed a new climate law (currently awaiting approval from the Senate) which ramps up the country’s ambition to lower emissions across multiple sectors to achieve net zero by 2050. The new bill enshrines the country’s emission reduction targets into legislation, which will undoubtedly impact how companies do business going forward.

Already we are seeing how this push towards decarbonisation is impacting the financial sector. Last week, the country saw one of its super ‘industry’ pension funds NGS Super announce it will divest from its oil and gas investments, a trend seen globally that will have significant impacts on financial markets.

These transition risks need to be systematically managed now, or else they could catalyse a global economic crisis according to the European Central Bank.  As more sectors and national economies become more and more integrated, the mismanagement of one risk could lead to a domino effect threatening financial stability.

Climate risk disclosures are seen as a key tool to increase transparency and corporate action when it comes measuring and managing these risks. But as the APRA survey shows, a voluntary framework may not be enough to meaningfully address and be proactive on climate risks as entities struggle to adapt to new frameworks and a changing environmental and financial climate.


More from SG Voice

Latest Posts