Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

ECB sets 2024 deadline for banks to reduce climate exposure

© Shutterstock / symbiotPost Thumbnail

Most banks assessed by the European Central Bank (ECB) fell short of expectations on managing climate and environmental risks.

  • The ECB has reviewed its member banks’ preparedness to manage climate and environmental risks.
  • While many had basic practices in place, most still have areas of weakness.
  • Banks have until the end of 2024 to meet the ECB’s supervisory expectations, signalling increasing pressure on the financial sector.

Results of the ECB’s thematic review

The ECB published the findings of its thematic review in a report titled Walking the talk. It assessed the alignment of 186 banks, holding a combined €25 trillion in assets, through the lens of the central bank’s supervisory expectations. Specifically, the process reviewed management processes put in place by these banks to identify and mitigate climate and environmental (C&E) risks, which included biodiversity dependence.

Basic processes to manage C&E risks were in place at 85% of the banks, the review found. This means they were able to map risk exposures, set performance indicators to warn of risks, and had developed organisational capabilities to manage their exposures. Since the ECB conducted its last review in 2021, however, 10% of banks had shown no progress. 

Major gaps and lack of advanced methodologies remain a concern

The review found that a significant number of banks had not adequately assessed physical and transition risks. Almost all (96%) showed weaknesses in their ability to comprehensively manage C&E exposures in key sectors, geographies and across risk drivers. For example, some banks had only made provisions to cover physical risks for floods (one type of risk driver) for their mortgage portfolios (one type of product). 

In this regard, the ECB found significant weaknesses in risk management and mitigation plans at 60% of the banks it assessed. There was also a lack of detail in data and installing advanced methodologies to deal with these weaknesses. Examples of these include forward-looking scenarios and multivariate analysis.

More needs to be done to meet supervisory expectations

Concerns remain over the ability to execute plans effectively and meet the ECB’s supervisory expectations. While many banks had established some plans to meet C&E-related exigencies, over half had failed to implement their own plans. The establishment of key performance and risk indicators at the institution level, for example, did not flow through to the product and portfolio levels, the review found. 

There was also a lack of preparedness from a resource and capacity perspective. The central bank has set deadlines to remedy these shortcomings, which averaged about 25 for each institution. It expects a full alignment with all of its supervisory expectations by 2024, with interim monitoring and assessment during 2023.

Examples of leading practice provide hope for compliance

A positive result of the review was that 25% of the banks demonstrated leadership in at least one of the 30 areas of assessment. The central bank has published a list of the leading practices that it hopes will serve as an example to the rest of the banks, especially the laggards.

A specific example of a leading practice was a bank that identified the risk of stranded assets, either from transition or due to climate change, in lending to fossil fuel industries. In response, the individual bank set a strategy of restricting lending to fossil fuel industries, which included a phase-out plan. It also included increased financing or renewables and expanding its insurance products to cover weather-related damages.

The ECB also found such leading practices in 25 of the 30 areas assessed, in sectors such as commercial lending, transport and agriculture. The adequate identification of risks and strategy responses provided gave it hope that it could drive full compliance with its supervisory expectations.

The approach of COP 27 will focus heavily on the continued financing of fossil fuels by banks. Leading practices by some European banks may provide hope and possibly drive positive negotiations at the summit.

More from SG Voice

Latest Posts